Alito's concerns about "loopholes" in the Supreme Court's universal injunctions ruling emerge as judges issue sweeping ...

The immediate impact of the high court's ruling — particularly in the innumerable challenges to Trump’s effort to reshape the ...

The high court has given the president immunity and protected him from nationwide injunctions. Congress is giving ground on ...

"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...

On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held, in a 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, that federal courts lack the authority to ...

The Supreme Court has just finished a term that should please conservatives, yet President Donald Trump is really not happy ...

WASHINGTON (TNND) — The fight over the limits of presidential power continues to play out in Washington. Last week, the ...

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi name-dropped a court in Maryland last week for blocking “virtually all of President [Donald] ...

Politics and intellectual consistency go together like banana on pizza. But the reaction from Democrats to last week’s Supreme Court ruling on judicial authority deserves special attention.

Every word matters in critical legal documents, and no language is more pored over and parsed for meaning than that used in our U.S. Constitution.

The court will hear arguments during its next term starting in the fall.

Issues once thought long settled are now up for grabs again. But, "they’re not going to get what they want," says Omar Jadwat of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project.